![]() ![]() Find Full Comment on Facebook įunding is not everything, of course if we acknowledge there is a moral imperative to ensure equal funding between First Nations and non-First Nations children, we must also note this imperative doesn’t extend to money alone. ![]() This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It would be no surprise, then, to see this decision come under some kind of additional judicial scrutiny even as the Liberal government enacts much of what the tribunal recommends. The ruling even acknowledges this obvious problem and, while claiming to recognize the need for balance, orders AANDC to “cease its discriminatory practices and reform the FNCFS Program and 1965 Agreement to reflect the findings in this decision” (emphasis theirs). There is a hard division of power here and even the Supreme Court would stop short of such an overreach (we’d hope.) To do so would grant this quasi-judicial body run by unelected judge wannabes the ability to override the government’s executive authority to dictate spending priorities. ![]() It’s difficult to fathom a serious court taking this order seriously, regardless of how just it may be. Equal funding alone is not going to be enough. Article content Given the particular challenges faced by First Nations children, Canada actually can’t be too loose with its purse strings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |